Recognition
Won new work, or the cash gap just won't sit still
Payroll and suppliers don't wait for customers to pay. A contract's been won but there's no invoice to raise yet. The overdraft got reduced at the last review. These are different triggers, but they land on the same facility.
Why it happens
Not every gap is invoice-shaped
Invoice finance advances against something that already exists: an invoice. A lot of real cash gaps happen before that point, or aren't tied to a specific invoice at all. They're a general, recurring need for flexible headroom. Trying to force that into invoice finance, or into a fixed-term loan sized for one specific cost, usually means borrowing the wrong shape of money.
Where this fits
Where the diagnosis usually lands on a credit line
If you started at facility mismatch and the cash is trapped before mobilisation or invoicing, or the constraint is an existing debenture rather than the amount available, a credit line is usually the resolution the diagnosis points to. The same applies from supporting growth where the core facility ceiling itself, not a card or a specific entity, is what's become too small.
The question most pages don't answer: "I already have invoice finance and a debenture registered against the business. Can I still borrow more?" Most published content explains what a debenture is. It doesn't explain what to actually check. See the full answer.
Specialist insight
Not the same thing as a term loan
A term loan is sized once, for one purpose, and repaid on a fixed schedule whether you're using the money that month or not. A credit line is sized for a range. You only pay interest on what you've actually drawn. Seasonal stock builds, a slow quarter, the working-capital gap on a large contract: if your cash need moves around across the year, a credit line is usually built for that shape. Forcing a term loan to fit tends to mean borrowing more than you need for longer than you need it.
Why not just use invoice finance instead?
Because invoice finance needs an invoice to advance against, and a credit line doesn't. That's the whole distinction, but it matters more than it sounds. Winning new work, covering a mobilisation period before you've delivered anything to bill for, buying stock ahead of a season: none of that has a customer invoice behind it yet. Invoice finance can't advance against work that hasn't been invoiced. A credit line can, because it isn't tied to a specific receivable at all: it's tied to the business generally. Businesses that already have invoice finance often still need a credit line alongside it, for exactly the gap invoice finance structurally can't reach.
One thing we've noticed: businesses tend to ask for the facility they've heard of, usually invoice finance, before checking whether an invoice actually exists yet to advance against. If the honest answer is "not yet," a credit line is very likely the closer fit, whatever the request started as.
Decision helper
What a lender actually looks at
- Trading history and consistency of cash flow, not just profitability.
- What security already exists on the business, and where a new facility would sit behind it.
- How the limit would actually get used: genuine working capital, not a substitute for equity.
Alternatives and limitations
An established business with a genuinely one-off, known-in-advance cost is usually better served by a straightforward term loan, which tends to be simpler and cheaper for that specific shape of need. And if you're currently relying on a bank overdraft as your main buffer, it's worth reading why that's become a less reliable plan than it used to be: see Overdraft.
Not sure this is the right facility?
Start from the mismatch, not the product
If the business is viable and the shortfall keeps recurring, the useful question is which stage of the cash cycle the money is trapped at, because that decides the facility. See facility mismatch.
